|
History of Embryology
Aristotle , in the 4th
century B.C., promoted the idea
that the embryo develops from a formless
mass that resulted from the union of semen with menstrual blood.
Aristotle believed that the male was the
major factor in reproduction, although
he did grant that the female
supplied the matter for shaping. Galen , 2nd century A.D., wrote
a book entitled “ On the formation of the foetus”, also held the two-seed
doctrine, claiming both the male and female seeds had coagulative power
and receptive capacity for coagulation but that one was stronger in the
male and the other in the female.From
the time of Galen , until the 16th century, the prevailed
wrong misconception that the embryo will grow in the uterus containing
clotted menstrual blood as a seed
till complete growth, with no record of major advances in the field of embryology.
In 1651 , William Harvey , One of
Fabricius' students at Padua , published his observations , using simple
lenses , on the development of
chick embryos, and description of the uteri of deer at
various stages during mating and pregnancy. He believed that the first
evidence of conception appeared long after the disappearance of semen
in the uterus . He
concluded that the embryos of the fallow
dear were secreted by the uterus , as he could not see its early stages
of development. Harvey postulated, following Aristotle, that the
specialised structures of the individual develop step by step from
unspecialised antecedents in the egg. This was known as the theory of
Epigenesis. Harvey put forward a new theory that summed up his
research, ‘ex ovo omnia’ (‘everything comes from the egg’),
implying in effect
that the role of parents in generation was indirect.They produced a
fertile egg or conceptus or seed, and this subsequently produced a new
animal or plant through innate vegetative powers .
Back to top
Other
researchers came forth with supporting conclusions, particularly
Marcello Malpighi,
the Italian biologist who i s considerd the father of modern embryology
, published in 1672 his
drwings of the developing chick . He
thought that the unincubated egg contained a tiny chick and that , in
older embryos , new structures gradually make their appearance untill a
chiken-like creature is produced .To
him , these structures were there all the time; he was just unable to
see them .
At about the same time,
in 1672, Regnier de Graaf
described little chambers in the uterus of the rabbit and concluded that
they must have come from the organs that he called the ovaries.
Undoubtedly , these little chambers were what we now call blastocysts.
He observed the
changes taking place in rabbits' ovaries in the first days after
fertilization and
described vesicular follicles in the ovary , which are still called De
Graaf’s follicles in his honor. However, he wrongly took the follicle to
be the egg.
He concluded that similar changes probably took place not only in the
rabbit doe but in the human female.
In
1677, Anton van Leeuwenhoek
, who made observations with a simple, early microscope , he became
interested in male semen after Johan Hamm, a medical student, consulted
him about microscopic creatures that he had observed in the semen of a
patient suffering from nocturnal emissions. Ham, the real discoverer of
sperm, thought that these microscopic creatures were evidence of
disease . Leeuwenhoek observed these microscopic creatures, and
announced the discovery of
spermatozoa and
concluded that they are the larvae of the humans and called them the
spermatozoa. Almost immediately after the results of his discoveries
were published in the proceedings of the British Royal Society in 1678,
all kinds of findings began to be reported.
Back to top
Niklass Hartsoeker's drawing of a human spermatozoon in 1694,
proved that the early microscope was not
sufficient to show the
detailed composition of the spermatozoon, and scientists had to complete
the picture from their own imagination. They expressed the generally
held concept that a fully formed human being in miniature form, or a
homunculus, is found in the spermatozoon that was thought to enlarge
after the sperm entered the uterus. At that
time, scientists held the view that human development was no more than
an increase in the size of a single form which enlarged with the
development of pregnancy. This belief was due to the domination of the preformation theory. As opposed to the supporters of epigenesis--who hypothesized that life
arose from formless matter--the preformationists reasoned that all life,
especially human life, was "preformed" at the moment of Creation; that
successive generations of individuals were encased, one inside the
other, in increasingly small and perfectly formed versions of their
adult selves.
Thus , From the
middle of the seventeenth century to the middle of the
eighteenth, the dominant theory was that of preformation, which
postulated that organisms contained all their future
descendants, folded up or encased in increasingly miniature
forms . According to this theory , there were
two schools of thought :
The ovists
:
believed that the future baby existed as a tiny,
preformed human being, enclosed in the egg and that sperm merely
stimulated the growth of the egg.
This Ovists thought women carried eggs containing boy and
girl children, and that the gender of the offspring was
determined well before conception.
The
spermists : thought that a fully formed human being in miniature
form, called homunculus , was found within the male sperm , that
was thought to enlarge after the sperm entered an ovum . The
spermists thought that the only contributions of the female to
the next generation were the womb in which the homunculus grew.
Back to top
In the
mid-eighteenth century, Buffon and Needham revived the theory of
spontaneous generation. In response Lazzaro
Spallanzani carried out a long series of experimental tests of
the role of sperm in reproduction
and the
preformation controversy finally ended in 1780 , when
Spallanzani proved that both the ovum and the sperm are
necessary for the development of a new individual.He developed
the techniques of artificial insemination on dogs and concluded
that the sperm was the fertilizing agent. He was also the first
to look at the effects of low temperatures on human sperm.But
Spallanzani remained an ovist, despite his demonstration of a
crucial role for sperm in reproduction.
In 1827 the Russian zoologist Karl Ernst
von Baer
discovered the mammalian eggs he described the oocyte in the
ovarian follicle of the dog , and observed dividing zygotes in
the uterine tube and blastocyst in the uterus .
He recognized
the formation of germ layers out of which the embryonic organs
develop and regarded the sperm cells as ‘Entozoa’, i.e.
parasites. In 1840, ‘Martin Barry expressed the belief that the
spermatozoa enters the egg.’ In 1859 , Charles Darwin ,
emphasized the hereditary nature of variability among members of
a species as an important factor in evolution. In 1865 , Gregor
Mendle, developed the principles of heredity. In 1866,
the German biologist
Ernst Heinrich Haeckel
claimed that members of all vertebrate classes pass through
identical embryonic stages. To illustrate this, he published
drawings of embryos of various species (human, rabbit, calf,
pig, chick, tortoise, salamander, and fish), suggesting that the
early stages of embryonic development are nearly identical for
all of these classes
.
Back to top
In 1875 , ‘Oscar Hertwig concluded from a study of the reproduction of
the sea urchin that fertilisation in both animals and plants consists of
the physical union of the two nuclei contributed by the male and female
parents.’ In 1877 , ‘Hermann Fol , a Swiss zoologist and physician ,
observed the penetration of the spermatozoan of a starfish into the egg.
He was able to see the transfer of the intact nucleus of the sperm into
the egg, where it became the male pronucleus.’ In 1878
, Flemming observed the chromosomes and suggested their role in
fertilization.In 1883 , von Beneden noticed that the mature germ cells
have a reduced number of chromosomes .
Toward the end of
the 19th century the German anatomist Wilhelm Roux, the father of
experimental embryology, as
he was the first one to manibulate embryos and observe the effects of
these manibulations on them . In 1888 , by an experiment conducted on
frog eggs , Roux reported that the fertilized egg receives substances
that represent different characteristics of the organism, which, as
cell division occurs, become linearly aligned on the chromosomes and
are subsequently distributed unequally to daughter cells. This
"qualitative division" fixes the fate of the cells and their descendants
because some of the determinants are lost to a cell at each division.
Another German embryologist, Hans Driesch in 1892 , studied the sea
urchin embryos and found that isolated cells at the four-cell stage
also develop normally and he concluded that each cell retains all the
developmental potential of the zygote. The conflict between these two
opposing views of development has been settled in favor of Driesch's
interpretation by numerous cell separation experiments and equal
distribution of hereditary information to all cells had been established
in the end the 19th century , however , its role in
development remained an enigma .
In 1924 the
German experimental embryologist Hans Spemann and
his student
Hilde Mangold discovered “embryonic
induction.” He found that the mesoderm of an undifferentiated embryo was
the “organizer” of brain and spinal cord formation from the overlying
ectoderm. The
essential nature of the organizer and the process of embryonic
induction remained a mystery until recent years. The current progress in
understanding embryonic induction has come from research on a class of
protein molecules , called growth factors, which were discovered by Rita
LeviMontalcini and Viktor Hamburger in the 1950s. A large number of
growth factors are discovered that play important roles in a variety of
developmental processes, including embryonic induction.
Back to top
A
comment
It is clear from the above description that the role of male and
female in the development of a new human being was only
appreciated near the end of the 19th century . The holy Qura'n , that was
revealed in the 7th century had documented that
creation of human being requires participation of both
sexes, Allah , the Almighty said :
"
O mankind ! We have created you from a male and a female ..." (Surah Al-Hujurat, 49 : Ayah 13 )
Print this page
Close the page
|